tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12925291.post4618424225639673868..comments2023-06-13T10:50:50.352+01:00Comments on anamchara: an etymology lessonKellihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08735539654032847525noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12925291.post-85770673325131179662007-03-03T22:09:00.000+00:002007-03-03T22:09:00.000+00:00I agree with Jared. And I also agree with the ear...I agree with Jared. And I also agree with the early Roman Catholic Church whose forsight rigidly kept scholasticism out of the hands of the common folk for centuries for fear that they would end up with 200 different interpretations of the text. It is a good thing they were wrong, we now have 23,000 different denominations all reaching various conclusions. May you and Tera save us from this rather ridiculous result through your humility and rather awesome brain powers.<BR/><BR/>Miss ya! I'll will talk to you soon, I promise : )Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12925291.post-90460167034208452552007-03-03T20:18:00.000+00:002007-03-03T20:18:00.000+00:00Yes, yes. I know - Scholasticism made important co...Yes, yes. I know - Scholasticism made important contributions to the life of the church. Are you asking me to do penance for presenting the silly side of Scholasticism? Maybe Allister McGrath can guest write that one too... ;)Kellihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08735539654032847525noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12925291.post-74783156569465075622007-03-03T19:33:00.000+00:002007-03-03T19:33:00.000+00:00As someone who, though not scholastic, does think ...As someone who, though not scholastic, does think scholasticism is often unfairly beaten up on . . . I think you should now do a follow-up post on the merits of scholasticism in the life of the church. :-)Jared Cramerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01665647940543562091noreply@blogger.com